research-vault

Free and open resources for doing research, in every major discipline.

Open data archives, literature access, free compute, software, publication pathways, funding, and learning materials — each with a concrete access method and an honest label for what is free and what is gated. Built for people researching without institutional access.

Scope
No sign-up needed
Field
Type
All resources

About this catalogue

Include a resource only where a meaningful free route exists, and state exactly what that route is — the package to install, the endpoint that needs no key, the registration hoop, the quota. Where a resource is free only in part, say which part. Where the wall is institutional, say so plainly instead of listing it as free. Prefer a number that can be checked at the source over an adjective that cannot.

A list of links answers what exists. The harder question — the one that costs an afternoon each time it goes unanswered — is what can I reach from where I am sitting. So the caveats here are not an appendix; they are half of what the catalogue is for.

How to read an entry

Free
Free outright. Free · sign-up needs an account, Free tier is free up to a quota, and Freemium has a paid product behind it — in every case the entry says which part is free.
●●●○○
Beginner-friendliness, 1 to 5. Five means a newcomer gets something useful out of it in ten minutes; one means a specialist toolchain and patience.
The grey box
How you actually reach it: the package to install, the endpoint, the portal. Click the icon to copy it.
The amber box
What will cost you time if you do not know it first — rate limits, licence terms, institutional gates, the part that is not free.

What is deliberately not here

  • Piracy. No Sci-Hub, LibGen, or their equivalents. Legal routes only — including the forgotten ones: Unpaywall, the Wikipedia Library, public-library access, and writing to the author, which works.
  • Paid tools with a free demo. If the free tier exists to sell the paid one, it is out. Where a field's standard tool is genuinely paid, the entry that replaces it says so, so that you stop looking.
  • Padding. Entries a researcher in that field would not actually recommend were cut, even where it left a section short. The funding sections are the honest example: routes open to unaffiliated researchers are scarce, and the catalogue says so rather than filling the space.

A note on accuracy

Every entry was checked against the resource's own pages, with figures taken from primary sources rather than secondary write-ups. That does not make it durable: free tiers shrink, archives migrate, grant programmes skip a year. Check the source before you build on it, and open a pull request when you find something that has moved — status changes are the one thing a catalogue cannot notice by itself.